From: Peter T. Daniels
Message: 1861
Date: 2003-12-12
>For the 24 gazillionth time, define "script." Marco's parallel of
> At 07:37 -0500 2003-12-12, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>
> >This involves nothing but a very strange definition of "script." No one
> >denies that there are four or more components of the Japanese writing
> >system, each with its own function. But to call the components "scripts"
> >is nothing short of bizarre.
>
> Why? The Hiragana and Katakana syllabaries are
> scripts, and the Latin alphabet is a script, and
> Han logowhatsits are a script.
> Janet Smith says "Modern Japanese is written in aJanet was writing many years before you started using some unfathomable
> mixture of three basic scripts: kanji, a
> logo-morphographic script; and hiragana and
> katakana, two syllabaries. Additionally, rômaji,
> 'romanization', eimoji 'English script' (roughly,
> non-Japanese words written in their [native]
> alphabetic script), and a variety of kigô
> 'symbols' are commonly interspersed in texts."
> (Japanese Writing, chapter 16, Daniels & Bright
> 1996).