Peter T. Daniels wrote:
> [...]
> It [Unicode] is a product of bureaucracy, with all the
> efficiency of the League of Nations.

If you say that Unicode's specifications is a poor starting point for
talking about the theory of writing systems, I am backing you up entirely
(although you certainly don't need my assistance to demonstrate something in
a field in which you are a recognized expert).

If you say that Unicode is not a valid engineering solution for encoding
text on computers, I am afraid that I'll challenge you to show up your
computer science skills and demonstrate that.

What did that long-haired guy say? "Give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar",
or something like that.

_ Marco