Re: (Presumed) Tibetan arrows

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 14:56:26 -0400, Nicholas Bodley
<nbodley@...> wrote:

> Oh, dear! I'm sorry! Perhaps that page needed a bright monitor setting;
> indeed, when I boosted Contrast*, indeed, I did see that what I had
> presumed were glyphs new to me were, indeed, only the highlights on
> quite-commonplace arrows. I apologize!

Three "indeed"s per sentence is too many. Oh, well.

--
nb