2003-01-23 06:53:30, "seshattrismegistos
<seshat@...>" <seshat@...> wrote:

> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qalam/surveys?id=386381
>
>As you see, several members indicated UTF-8 as a proper
>choice [...]

Indeed, utf-8 seems to be gaining deserved popularity.

I tried to read all of the archives before subscribing.

>For historical reasons, many members of Qalam are also

members of the mailing lists of the Unicode Consortium
(http://www.unicode.org/consortium/distlist.html), and have
some degree of experience and interested in Unicode.

No wonder there are some Famous Names here!

[...]

>interest in writing systems, I think that several members

might have Unicode support.

Naturally.

>having Unicode support could lack font for that particular

script.

>Pictures or other files (PDF's, etc.) can be freely attached

to messages,

I'm sorry, but are you sure that YahooGroups permits
attachments to messages passed through its system? Another
YahooGroup I subscribe to strips all attachments from
messages posted to it. Perhaps that is the moderator/owner's
choice. Indeed, being able to include attachments would be
lovely.

>or they can be uploaded on Qalam's "Files" or "Photos"

sections:

How nice! Sorry if I missed those when I signed on; actually,
that was some time ago, and apparently directvinternet.com
regarded all messages from Qalam as spam. :(

> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qalam/files
> http://photos.groups.yahoo.com/group/qalam/lst

Thank you, and best regards!

Nicholas Bodley ||@|| Waltham, Mass.
Why use Opera? http://tntluoma.com/opera/lover/
Sent via TheWorld.com