--- In qalam@yahoogroups.com, "Doug
Ewell" <dewell@...> wrote:
> I was considering posting a
response to Richard Comaish, but
perceived
> that it would be time-consuming
and not strictly necessary, and
perhaps
> indicative of conservative moral
laziness.
>
So you didn't.
Gee, thanx, Suzanne - cool profile
BTW. Now we all know what a 'wonk'
is. ;)
r