Re: About "features" RE: Hangul script type: (was Re: [OT] ANN: S i

From: Peter_Constable@...
Message: 641
Date: 2001-11-13

On 11/13/2001 07:12:29 AM "Peter T. Daniels" wrote:

>Maybe you can "classify" writing systems without using the category.
>Fine! But if your "classification" doesn't note that Korean is
>qualitatively different from all the others, then it's missing
>something.

I certainly want to point out the qualitative differences, but I also want
to compare apples and apples, and I also want to point out any significant
similarities, if they exist. And where I am pointing out differences, I
was to be able to state explicitly what those differences are.



- Peter


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <peter_constable@...>

Previous in thread: 639
Next in thread: 646
Previous message: 640
Next message: 642

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts