Peter wrote:

> Then why do you keep nagging _me_ about it?

Peter replied:

> I'm nagging you? You've told Lars and me that our
> interest is totally unfounded [...]

Peter replied:

> But you don't do that, and you keep asking *me* to
> provide justification [...]

Peter replied:

> If you had read the messages thoroughly in the first
> place, I wouldn't need to bother.

Peter replied:

> I see no need to memorize people's messages.

Peter replied:

> Peter, this is quite rediculous. I won't bother asking
> for a poll to see if others agree that I did provide an
> explanation. [...]

Peeeeters? Hallo.

When I talked about how interesting and polite your discussion was,
that was not intended as a reproach.

And when I mentioned ping-pong discussions, that was not intended as
a suggestion.

It was a long and complicated thread so, if one Peter doesn't
remember exactly what the other Peter said, please the other Peter
restate in brief his point. (Or was it the other way round?)

Regards.
Seshat