Re: Hangul script type: (was Re: [OT] ANN: Site about scripts)

From: Peter_Constable@...
Message: 548
Date: 2001-11-11

On 11/11/2001 06:34:53 AM "Peter T. Daniels" wrote:

>> So far, I can't even tell if you looked at those
>> defining criteria. You're comment above seems to indicate that you did
>> not.
>
>When I saw that you re-mushed-together abugida and syllabary, I didn't
>need to look any more closely.

It seems to me that you are making assumptions about the categories that
are being "mushed together" that may not necessarily be valid. Why not
read the defining criteria given before passing judgment?



- Peter


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <peter_constable@...>

Previous in thread: 544
Next in thread: 568
Previous message: 547
Next message: 549

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts