Re: About "features" RE: Hangul script type: (was Re: [OT] ANN: Si
From: Lars Marius Garshol Message: 541 Date: 2001-11-11
* william bright
|
| in all the discussion of "featural" systems, i find it strange that
| there is so little mention of pitman shorthand or gregg shorthand,
| which were once used daily by thousands of people.
For my part this is mainly because I haven't looked at those systems
very closely yet. It does seem to make sense to include them, but I am
incapable at this point to say anything sensible about them.
| both these systems were partly "featural", pitman i think more than
| gregg.
Why were they only partly featural? What about them is it that makes
them fail to be featural?
--Lars M.
Previous in thread: 508 Next in thread: 542 Previous message: 540 Next message: 542