On 11/09/2001 10:50:20 PM "Peter T. Daniels" wrote:

>Then I trust you make it clear that though you claim to use my typology,
>you don't!

Have I not made it clear all along that I am using a revised typology? The
very fact that I eliminated the type "featural" ought to have made that
clear. I spelled out the types I propose and explicitly stated the
defining criteria. So far, I can't even tell if you looked at those
defining criteria. You're comment above seems to indicate that you did

- Peter

Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <peter_constable@...>