From: Peter T. Daniels
Message: 293
Date: 2001-10-08
> My impression is that such an inaccuracy, while acceptable for a singleThat doesn't make sense -- gold is the *softest* metal available in
> copy, would not have been tolerated if the document served as a master to
> "print" several copies. Moreover, according to some technological arguments
> that I have read, punches hard and resistible enough to allow multiple use
> on clay should have been in metal, probably gold. Now, while it is
> plausible that the scribes had enough gold to build the tip of a few
> punches, it is less likely that they could afford a 14 centimeters solid
> ingot to print the whole disk.