From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 646
Date: 2003-11-01
>> The step /ft/ > /pt/ inIt's similar to the extremely limited change of *fs > ps in Old English
>> Romanian also offers no phonetic problems, although /f/ does not
> otherwise
>> yield /p/ in Romanian (only in the clusters /pt/, /ps/ < */ft/,
> */fs/).
>
> Are there other examples of this limited change? I couldn't think
> of any, which is what bothers me about the idea.