From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 628
Date: 2003-09-04
> Perhaps he said ["pan'krVs]. That is what I would say. Thewould
> realisation of the /n/ would vary, sometimes yielding /N/. I
> say the opposition is close to being neutralised there. Perhaps ITwo further comments:
> can't talk properly. ["paNkr&s] is possible, but does not feel
> right.