From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 536
Date: 2003-08-12
>all
>
> Richard Wordingham wrote:
> > More to the point, it seems that [p\], [f], [T], [s] and [x] are
> > close to [h]. Or are we just looking at a shift from africative to
> > an approximant when these fricatives fade out? Voicelessrest of
> > approximants are silent :)
>
> I would guess, that [historical] linguists would judge
>
> 1, p/f to be close (place)
> 2. s/x to be close (fricative) and also because of Iranian and
> IE e.g. s/xI've been using the extended SAMPA notation. I've just put a chart
> 3. some could say f/s (fricative)
>
> I don't know what [T] represents.