Suttanipata Comy on word aparam

From: Bhikkhu Bodhi
Message: 4493
Date: 2015-11-29

Dear Pali Friends,

Can someone help me with the following passage from Paramattha-jotikā II, p. 398, commenting on the word aparaṃ in the Subhāsitasutta. It occurs in the stock phrase:
Idaṃ vatvāna sugato athāparaṃ etadavoca satthā ("Having said this, the Fortunate One, the Teacher, further said this: ...").
Tattha aparanti gāthābandhavacanaṃ sandhāya vuccati. Taṃ duvidhaṃ hoti – pacchā āgataparisaṃ assavanasussavanaādhāraṇadaḷhīkaraṇādīni vā sandhāya tadatthadīpakameva ca. Pubbe kenaci kāraṇena parihāpitassa atthassa dīpanena atthavisesadīpakañca ‘‘purisassa hi jātassa, kuṭhārī jāyate mukhe’’ tiādīsu (su. ni. 662) viya. Idha pana tadatthadīpakameva.

Here is my tentative translation:
Here, the word “further” (aparaṃ) is used with reference to the statement that connects the verse [to the prose]. That is done in two ways: (1) With reference to an assembly that has arrived late, as the confirmation and reinforcement, etc., of what has not been heard and what has been well heard, and (2) as illustrating its meaning.  And “illustrating a particular meaning” [is achieved] by  illustration of a meaning that for some reason has previously been omitted, as in the case of the verse, “When a person has taken birth an axe is born inside his mouth” and so forth (Sn 657).

I'm particularly stumped by the expression
assavanasussavanaādhāraṇadaḷhīkaraṇādīni vā sandhāya. Is the long compound to be taken as a  four-term dvanda (assavana + sussavana + ādhāraṇa + daḷhīkaraṇādīni)? Or is there a tappurisa relationship between assavanasussavana and ādhāraṇadaḷhīkaraṇādīni (which is how I have tentatively rendered it)? And what exactly is the role here of assavanasussavana, "non-hearing" and "well-hearing"?

As I understand it, the reference to the verse about the axe in the mouth is brought in to show that what is missing in the prose (the parihāpita attha) is an explicit condemnation of slanderous speech. In the prose the Buddha only warns Kokaliya not to malign Sariputta and Moggallana, but he does not draw a general principle from this. The verses bring out the general principle. Of course, I could be completely off base here.

I welcome any comments. Thank you in advance.

Best wishes,

-- 
Ven. Bhikkhu Bodhi
Chuang Yen Monastery
2020 Route 301
Carmel NY 10512
U.S.A.

To help feed the hungry and educate disadvantaged children around the world,
please check:
Our website: http://www.buddhistglobalrelief.org/
Our blog: http://buddhistglobalrelief.wordpress.com/

For my Dhamma lectures and teachings:
http://www.baus.org/en/?cat=9 (includes schedule of classes)
http://bodhimonastery.org/a-systematic-study-of-the-majjhima-nikaya.html
http://www.noblepath.org/audio.html
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL23DE0292227250FA

For my public photo albums:
http://picasaweb.google.com/venbodhi


Sabbe sattā averā hontu, abyāpajjā hontu, anighā hontu, sukhī hontu!
願眾生無怨,願眾生無害,願眾生無惱,願眾生快樂!
May all beings be free from enmity, free from affliction, free from distress. May they be happy!

Next in thread: 4494
Previous message: 4492
Next message: 4494

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts