avihimsa·sankappa and abyapada·sankappa
From: Kumara Bhikkhu
Message: 3901
Date: 2014-09-23
avihimsa·sankappa and abyapada·sankappa
From: Kumara Bhikkhu
Message: 3901
Date: 2014-09-23
In samma·sankappa, we find abyapada·sankappa and
avihimsa·sankappa (besides nekkhamma·sankappa). I
still can't see why is there a need to include
avihimsa·sankappa. Shouldn't abyapada·sankappa cover it?
OR perhaps I'm not understanding these terms correctly.
Please enlighten.
mettâ,
kb
Next in thread: 3902
Previous message: 3900
Next message: 3902Contemporaneous posts Posts in thread all posts