Re: Kacc 10 revisited

From: Eisel Mazard
Message: 2270
Date: 2007-11-11

Ole,

   I agree that your orthographic interpretation makes sense --but I
would add that the other interpretations DO NOT make sense.

   I pored over the other options presented to me, but, in the final
analysis, there is no viable alternative to the orthographic
explanation (that I know of).

   The alternate explanations do, simply, look like attempts to
over-compensate for the fact that the author does not understand the
verse, and I agree that the use of "above" and "below" is
non-ambiguous in this context.

E.M.

Previous in thread: 2269
Next in thread: 2271
Previous message: 2269
Next message: 2271

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts