Re: te suta.m/me suta.m

Dear Ole,

I am not sure on the general issue, but in this case I don't
understand why you see a problem.

>See, for
>instance, the following example from S III 134: sammukhaa me ta.m aavuso ...
>Bhagavato suta.m sammukhaa ca pa.tiggahita.m Kaccaanagotta.m bhikkhum
>ovadantassa: dvayanissito, and so on. ovadantassa evidently qualifies
>Bhagavato (gen.), so we confront an example similar to the one I mentioned
>earlier: Two genitives are apparently constructed with suta.m.

Why would there be problem in rendering:

"This, friend Channa, has been heard and apprehended  by me
face-to-face with the Lord as he was instructing the monk
Kaccaanagotta:  ... " ?

Lance