Re: Kacc 1-5-1 (query & translation)

> My edition was completed in 1997.

This is not a fact I had ever been apprised of --you have always
described it as "forthcoming".

I will, therefore, include your new edition in my comparative reading
if it appears in print prior to my own publication.

Incidentally, did the "500 year old" Kacc MS in Maha-Sarakham catch
your imagination?

Eventually, I will have to inspect it to test its claims to such
antiquity.  It is nice, at least, if such a culture exists where Kacc
is considered important enough to be the subject of such a hoax.

E.M.