Re: Iti & ti

Hi,

>
>Thus the ambiguity: given that early written Pali did not distinguish
>double consonants or long vowels in its orthography, "iiti" vs. "itti"
>may well have been resolved in subsequent spelling reforms, i.e., the
>amendment of the canon to suit the new orthography.

How does this apply to the case where the word preceding iti ends in an anusvara? That's what I still don't understand.

best regards,

/Rett