Re: napumsaka

On 8/25/05, nina <vangorko@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Ole and Jim,
> Ole, you explained some time ago about the napumsaka use of kama.m,
> adverbial use.
> In the Visuddhimagga Tiika (Ch XIV, 186) this case came up, and here it
> seems to refer to all inclusive, it pervades all, sabba.m. Is there a rule
> in the Kaccayaana?
> To give the context, just a few texts:
> Text Vis.:186. Herein, the word 'whatever' includes without exception.
> 'Materiality' prevents over-generalization. Thus materiality is
> comprised without exception by the two expressions.
> 186. tattha ya.mki~nciiti anavasesapariyaadaana.m. ruupanti
> atippasa"nganiyamana.m. eva.m padadvayenaapi ruupassa anavasesapariggaho
> kato hoti. athassa atiitaadinaa vibhaaga.m aarabhati. ta~nhi ki~nci
> atiita.m, ki~nci anaagataadibhedanti. esa nayo vedanaadiisu.
>
> Tiika: Ya.m ki~nciiti ettha yanti saama~n~nena aniyamadassana.m. Ki~nciiti
> pakaarabheda.m aamasitvaa aniyamadassana.m. Ubhayenaapi atiita.m vaa pe pe
> santike vaa appa.m vaa bahu.m vaa yaadisa.m vaa taadisa.m vaa
> napu.msakaniddesaaraha.m sabba.m byaapetvaa ga.nhaatiiti aaha
> Œanavasesapariyaadaanan¹ti. Eva.m pana a~n~nesupi napu.msakaniddesaarahesu
> pasa"nga.m disvaa tattha adhippetattha.m aticca pavattanato
> atippasa"ngassa
> niyamanattha.m ruupanti vuttanti dassento Œruupanti
> atippasa"nganiyamanan¹ti
> aaha.
> ----
> I am especially interested at the napu.msakaniddesaaraha.m sabba.m
> byaapetvaa...
> It seems it has to do with sabba.m.
> Thank you, Nina.
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]