SV: correction

Dear Jim,

Here is a brief note concerning the treatment of the adverb by the Paali
grammarians. There is an interesting discussion in Saddatthabhedacintaa
verse 302ff about the grammatical category of adverb (kriyaavisesana.m): the
term used in satthe (usually denoting Sanskrit Grammar) as opposed to
dhaatuvisesana.m or bhaavanapu.msaka.m that is mentioned in saasane (i.e.
paali lit. such as the commentaries, etc).

Best,

Ole



-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: palistudy@yahoogroups.com [mailto:palistudy@yahoogroups.com] På vegne
af Jim Anderson
Sendt: 5. august 2005 03:27
Til: palistudy@yahoogroups.com
Emne: Re: [palistudy] correction

Dear Ole,

In my previous message I wrote:

> A problem comes up in Sadd as it has both the bhaavanapu.msaka and
> itthambhuutalakkha.na rule. This suggests redundancy of one of them

should be:

A problem comes up in Sadd as it has both the *visesana* and
itthambhuutalakkha.na rule.

Sorry for the mix up.

Jim




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com



Yahoo! Groups Links