Re: se.t.tho -- derivation 4
From: Jim Anderson
Message: 827
Date: 2004-02-24
Dear Nina,
[...]
> > This is only speculation. Also, it seems possible that the phrase
> > might have been understood differently among the Brahmins
themselves
> > depending on which part of India they lived in and other factors.
> N: I am very ignorant, and we could also ask Suan perhaps?
Suan is welcome to add more to this if he wishes.
> I feel lost when thinking of subclasses of compounds. I shall look
at Warder
> again.
I think the simplest approach is to build on the four main types I
mentioned earlier. The digu and kammadhaaraya are considered to be
pa.thama-tappurisas (1st tp). The kammadhaaraya is divided again into
9 subtypes in the Saddaniiti. I think digu compounds (eg. tiloka.m,
tipi.taka.m) are probably the easiest to identify while bahubbiihis
are the most difficult. There is a special chapter on compounds in
Kaccayana as is also the case with the Saddaniiti and other grammars.
It's a subject that I still have a great deal more to learn about. As
I slowly work through the grammar, I'll do my best to analyse the
compounds met with along the way. There will be another one
(tilokamahita.m) coming up soon which we briefly touched on last
month.
I would like to correct what I quoted earlier from Sadd p.752 on
'abhidhammo' as a kammadhaaraya compound. "atireko adhiko vaa
abhidhammo" should read "atireko adhiko vaa dhammo abhidhammo". I had
left out an important word in the explanation.
> J: I'm not sure if it will help but thanks anyway and I've taken
note. I
> > checked the Yamaka cty but didn't find the terms in the discussion
> > relating to 'i.t.thaaramman.na'.
> N: Here it is: Under uppatti.t.thaanavaarava..n..nanaa, about the
two
> feelings that can arise with kaamaraaga and the object experienced:
> <nanu cesa aaramma.navasena anusayamaano na kevala.m imaasu dviisu
> vedanaasu
> ceva vedanaasampayuttadhammesu ca anuseti, i.t.thesu pana
ruupaadiisupi
> anusetiyeva. vuttampi ceta.m vibha"ngappakara.ne (vibha0 816) ``ya.m
loke
> piyaruupa.m saataruupa.m, ettha sattaana.m kaamaraagaanusayo
anusetii''ti
> imasmimpi pakara.ne anusayavaarassa pa.tilomanaye vutta.m. ``>
Thank you for quoting the passage. Now I know where to look.
Jim