RE: Num : orientation

From: Kom Tukovinit
Message: 71
Date: 2001-04-03

Dear Na (Aunt) Amara,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amara [mailto:joychay@...]
>
> But to cross refer to the dsg ongoing discussion
> between us, don't you
> think Sarah is right about the upadana and
> different levels of
> paccaya?  I haven't had time to check the
> details, and will not be
> there for the Sat. ED nor will be seeing TA for
> at least 14 days, but
> perhaps you could follow through in the meantime
> with Sarah's
> response.  An amendment doesn't seem to be in order?

I am sure Sarah is right about how Dosa can condition Lobha
to arise.  I haven't had the chance to read it thoroughly
yet, but perhaps by the upcoming weekend.

>
> Also, conventionally I remember you are a year or
> two younger than my
> nephew Alain, so I am definitely old enough to be
> your aunt!
>

Yes, in that case, you have at least three nephews in this
group.  It's an interesting co-incidence that the three of
us (K. Num, K. Jaran, and I) ran into TA. Sujin, DSG, an PSG
at about the same age.  Conventionally (even with the
pannatti "pointing" to paramatha), I can think of many
kusala characteractics of many people in this group, so it
would be easy to call people aunts, uncles, older brother,
etc.

Nephew kom


Previous in thread: 70
Next in thread: 72
Previous message: 70
Next message: 72

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts