Dear Frank,
Op 14-mrt-2012, om 19:09 heeft frank het volgende geschreven:

> Thanks for the Abhidhamma and commentary perspective. It is helpful.
> Do they explain how the walking/standing/sitting/lying is to practiced
> differently under the two categories? My impression of reading what
> you
> wrote seems that the 4 resorts would apply in both categories of
> sampajanakari and pajanati.

-------
N: Pa~n~naa is what matters. All phenomena that appear, no matter in
what posture, have to be eventually understood as impermanent,
dukkha, anattaa. When we think of a posture the object of thinking is
a concept, but in the ultimate sense there are no postures, only
naama and ruupa. These have to be understood as they are. It does not
matter what word is used, sampajanakari or pajanati, but
understanding should be developed.
------
Nina.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]