Dear Yong Peng,

Op 24-mei-2010, om 18:11 heeft Ong Yong Peng het volgende geschreven:

> Just a quick discussion on naagamaasi.
>
> I take it as na aagamaasi, did not come.
>
> aagamaasi is the aorist singular form of aagacchati. Is it in the
> 2nd or the 3rd person?
>
> We had a discussion on this 6.5 years ago! ;-)

------
N: It was fun reading old messages. You are right, aagamaasi is the
third person. Warder, Ch 11: the second person is: agamaa. So I was
wrong.

Perhaps Jim has additional info from the old grammars he is studying.
Nina.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]