Dear DC,

Op 27-jan-2010, om 19:00 heeft DC Wijeratna het volgende geschreven:

> DC: Di.t.thi by itself is not akusala. It is micchaadi.t.thi that
> is an akusala according to sammaadi.t.thi sutta of the MN 1.8

--------
N: It depends on the context. The term micchaa is not always added to
di.t.thi. Nor is the term sammaa always added to di.t.thi.
Nina.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]