Venerable Pandita,
Thank you very much for the explanations. I have to get used to these
notions.
With respect,
Nina.
Op 10-dec-2009, om 14:14 heeft ashinpan het volgende geschreven:

> But if it were the object, it would mean that the action performs
> itself, and "purisena" would have made no sense. If we check the
> context in this way, "kamma���" is clearly the active object.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]