Re: Problems with a sutta in the Majjhima (imaaha.m and santaara.ni

From: abhidhammika
Message: 11485
Date: 2007-07-25

Dear Nina, Florian

How are you?

Nina wrote:

"imaaha.m : can this be a sandhi: ime aha.m? I do not have the text,
a whole sentence would be helpful."

Yes, Nina, it is a trick of sandhi. Imaaham is to be seprated Im()
and Aha.m. Im() will assume the case form of the noun it
qualifies or indicates.

Thus,

imaaha.m panca dhamme will become ime aha.m panca dhamme.

Imaaha.m kulla.m nissaaya will become ima.m aha.m kulla.m nissaaya.

Both are from Majjimanikaaya.


With regards,

Suan Lu Zaw

www.bodhiology.org




--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Nina van Gorkom <vangorko@...> wrote:


Dear Florian,
>

> imaaha.m : can this be a sandhi: ime aha.m? I do not have the text,
> a whole sentence would be helpful.


> santaara.nii.: PED: (p. 676) conveying to the other shore.
Nina.


Op 16-jul-2007, om 20:57 heeft walpolarahula het volgende geschreven:

> Can someone help me about a sutta in the Majjhima Nikaya ?
> It is the 2040st of the first part (PTS : 134(30)-135(26)).
> I do not find what are the words imaaha.m and santaara.nii.

Previous in thread: 11473
Next in thread: 11489
Previous message: 11484
Next message: 11486

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts