Re: nevasekkhonaasekkho puggalo

From: Dmytro O. Ivakhnenko
Message: 11132
Date: 2007-03-09

Dear Keren,

> Can someone clarify the term nevasekkhonaasekkho puggalo? Is it the
> Buddha who had no teacher?
>
> It occur in DN III.218:
> Tayo puggalaa– sekkho puggalo, asekkho puggalo, nevasekkhonaasekkho
> puggalo.

19. Katamo ca puggalo sekkho? Cattāro maggasamaṅgino tayo
phalasamaṅgino puggalā “sekkhā”. Arahā asekkho. Avasesā puggalā
nevasekkhanāsekkhā.

Puggala-pannatti 14

http://www.lioncity.net/buddhism/index.php?showtopic=23156

Metta, Dmytro

Previous in thread: 11119
Previous message: 11131
Next message: 11133

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts