--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Gunnar Gällmo <gunnargallmo@...> wrote:

>
> >
> I think Buddhism is fundamentally
> anti-fundamentalistic. Having views, and knowing them
> to be views, is all right; having views, and believing
> them to be objective facts, is not.
>
> And that includes the view that certain texts are
> infallible.

=den pE http://se.mail.yahoo.com

>

=====
Dera Gunnar ,
and this view of yours (above)is it fallible?

Is sammaditthi , right view, true and factual, or fallible?

The view that the texts are wrong (fallible). Is that view true?
Robert