From: rjkjp1
Message: 11105
Date: 2007-03-03
>understanding
> Dear Nina,
>
> thanks again. While the commentary is a good source for
> the Buddha's words, a large portion of the suttas can be read andteachings.
> understood without the aid of the commentary. Therefore, I do not
> favor incorporating the commentary in the sutta. The commentary, at
> the very best, can only be a secondary source for Buddha's
>aparaadhaa.
> I think every sutta presents a fountain of knowledge, a chart for
> discoveries, and we should preserve its original form as much as
> possible so that each individual can then make the discovery for him
> or herself. In this way, the sutta and the commentary (or the
> commentator) each has its place and role.
>
> The commentary says "dukanipaatassa pa.thame vajjaaniiti dosaa
> aparaadhaa": in the first of Dukanipaata, vajjaani = dosaa
> We will take note of this whenever we come across 'vajja' in thefirst
> five vaggas.from
>
> Thanks also for your expansion on 'kamma'.
>
> metta,
> Yong Peng.
>
>
> --- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Nina van Gorkom wrote:
>
> > I understand 'vajja' not just to refer to something severe,
> > but misdeeds and wrongdoings in general. In the perspective
> > of this sutta, we may infer 'vajja' to mean "evil deeds",
> > but I think the word has a wider and more general usage.
>
> N: I looked at the Co: vajjaaniiti dosaa aparaadhaa. Dosa is here
> another stem than dosa meaning illwill. It means corruption,that
> depravity, fault etc. Vajja has a wide sense as you say. Aparaadha:
> sin, fault, offense. I think, considering the heavy punishments,
> fault is too weak. We could chose: offense, corruption, depravity.
>