Dear Piya and Nina,

Thank you for the clarification and the website.

--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, "Piya Tan" <dharmafarer@...> wrote:
>
> Keren,
>
> You might also like to refer to an annotated translation of the
Potthapada
> Sutta in dharmafarer.googlepages.com in the Introduction and the
relevant
> section. Click on the Digha icon, and you will find a number of
annotated
> translations of the Digha suttas.
>
> Happy reading and awakening.
>
> Piya
>
> For Sutta translations with notes, cross-references, comparative
study,
> biblio, etc, go to
>
> dharmafarer.googlepages.com
>
>
> On 9/18/06, Nina van Gorkom <vangorko@...> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Keren,
> > This passage is about Po.t.thapaada's belief in a soul. My PTS
gives
> > footnotes. The coarse one is a material soul, having rupa. We
have to
> > look at the Brahmajala sutta for such theories.
> > The mind-made is also material, but very subtle.
> > The aruupi is without ruupa, only mental.
> > Thus this is in the context of theories about the soul or attaa.
> > Nina.
> > Op 17-sep-2006, om 8:08 heeft keren_arbel het volgende
geschreven:
> >
> >
> > > I have a question regarding a passage in DN I.186-199.
> > > Po.t.thapaada is declaring three types of self, and then the
Buddha
> > > is elaborating on this "acquired self" (attaa patilaabha):
> > > the ol.aariko, the manomaya.m & the aruupi.m.
> > >
> > > It is the first time I see this analysis and I'm not sure what
it
> > > means.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>