>Dear Rett
>
>Thank you for your reply. You're one of those 'kind
>persons' I mentioned. ^^
>
>I have the same idea as yours. It's just the missing
>'-an' [you mean -a- ?, rett] that makes me confused and uncertain. I think
>you might be right, they are Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit
>and might not stict to the rules of classic sanskrit.
>
>with a lot of metta
>

Hi again,

I'm embarrassed to ask this, as I really ought to know, but if the augment were there in the Sanskrit would it be upaasa.mkraman or upasamakraman ? I think the former sounds better, but I don't have my grammar books at hand.

best regards,

/Rett