NOTE:
[Below is what I (Alan) meant to ask. Please disregard the non-corrected previous version]
Ole Holten Pind wrote:
>
>>Does this clarify your query a bit?
>>
>>Best wishes,
>>
>>Ole
>>
>>
>
>
Dear Dr. Pind,
Thank you for the in-depth response. It does indeed clarify the
situation. I have a quick follow-up question, however.
Do you happen to know if this type of 'syntactical compound,' with an
absolutive as the first member, has a particular designation in the
"Saddaniiti," or is it subsumed under another more common type of
compound such as the "kammadhaaraya" in that work?
With metta,
Alan