Ole Holten Pind wrote:
>
>Does this clarify your query a bit?
>
>Best wishes,
>
>Ole
>
>
Dear Dr. Pind,
Thank you for the in depth response. It does indeed clarify the
situation. I have a quick follow-up question, however.
Do you happen to know if this type of semantic compound, with an
absolutive as the first member, has a particular designation in the
"Saddaniiti," or is it subsumed under another more common type of
compound such as the "kammadhaaraya" in that work?
With metta,
Alan