Dear Rett and Peng,
I am sorry. The correct word is titthiya and aññatitthiya. I typed
wrongly as titthakas and aññatitthakas. The sanskrit word, however,
is tirthakas. It looks like this word was used for all non-Buddhists
including the people who followed the vedas(Hindus) and Nigantha
Natputtiyas (jains)

Rajendra Jadhao

--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, rett <rett@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Yong Peng,
>
> Maybe aññatitthiya (as a compound) or aññadi.t.thika.
>
> Best regards,
>
> /Rett
>
>
> >Dear friends,
> >
> >I searched the CSCD but cannot find the term "anya titthaka", not
even
> >anything close. Can someone advise? Thank you.
> >
> >
> >metta,
> >Yong Peng.
> >
> >--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, mastram101 wrote:
> >
> >You are right. The word hindu did not exist in Buddha's time. The
> >Buddhist scriptures in pali use the word "anya titthaka" or
titthakas
> >to describe the people who are called "hindus" today.
> >
> >
> >> --- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Nagaraja Rao V Tripuroju wrote:
> >>
> >> The word 'hindu' was not there at the time of buddha!!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >Paa.li-Parisaa - The Pali Collective
> >[Homepage] http://www.tipitaka.net
> >[Files] http://www.geocities.com/paligroup/
> >[Send Message] pali@yahoogroups.com
> >Yahoo! Groups members can set their delivery options to daily
digest
> >or web only.
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>