-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra:
Pali@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
Pali@yahoogroups.com] På vegne af Khemaramsi
Sendt: 25. september 2005 10:01
Til: Pali Group
Emne: [Pali] Bahubhihii or Kammadhaaraya
Dear Pind and others
If akusala-sa.nkhaataa qualify dhammaa, that is, dhammas called as the unwholesome, what type of compound, according to Pali grammarians, does akusala-sa.nkhaataa belongs to? Bahubhihii or Kammadhaaraya ? I am inclined to think it a kammadhaaraya, which is called sambhaavanaapubbapada in a grammar book by Ven. U Pandita,from whom I learned Pali grammar for two months. But, I am not sure. Any comment is appreciated.
It is sometimes difficult to decide with absolute certainty to which type any given compound belongs. Now this is not a possessive compound and it is not a kammadhaaraya either. It is a dependent compound i.e. a tappurisa, if you like, akusala being dependent upon sa.nkhaataa: called (by the term) akusala.
Hope this helps
With kind regards
Ole Pind
metta
Tzung-Kuen
___________________________________________________ 郔陔唳 Yahoo!藻撈籵? 7.0 betaㄛ轎愐鋒繚??斕湖ㄐ
http://messenger.yahoo.com.tw/beta.html
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/b0VolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Homepage]
http://www.tipitaka.net [Files]
http://www.geocities.com/paligroup/
[Send Message]
pali@yahoogroups.com
Paaliga.na - a community for Pali students Yahoo! Groups members can set their delivery options to daily digest or web only.
Yahoo! Groups Links