Dear Yong Peng,
aapatti: you replaced later ecclesiastical by monastic, this is better. I
also found: a transgression of the rules of the Order.
Y.P.: explain not an abominable monastic offence as 'an abominable monastic

> offence',

N: another option: a grave transgression
op 22-09-2005 12:48 schreef Ong Yong Peng op yongpeng.ong@...:

> Anaapatti Vagga


>YP:explain not an abominable monastic offence as 'an abominable monastic
> offence',

-------
N: explain what is not a grave transgression...
----------
Y.P.: saavasesa.m aapatti.m anavasesaa aapattiiti diipenti ...pe...

> explain a residual monastic offence as 'a non-residual monastic
> offence',

-------
N: PTS has: a complete offence as a partial offence.
The Commentary explains it as being the same as the next one: unpardonable
and pardonable.
The footnote says: the latter ruins the state of a bhikkhu, the former may
be atoned for.
*****
Nina.