Dear Alan and friends,

thanks, Alan. Warder's lists vi+muc as Conj. III. I think that is
because (1) we have to ignore vi (a prefix), and (2) no nasal is
inserted at the end of 'mu' (of muc).

I will be posting a list of verbs with their stems and conjugational
group. I hope you can help me to vet it if time permits. Thanks.


metta,
Yong Peng.

--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Alan McClure wrote:

vimutto [vi+muc II/pp/nom/sg] freed

Though this seems tricky because the passive conjugation of "muc" is
III (muccati) form with active being II (mu~ncati) form, so I guess
we should stick with the II form in describing a past participle?
I'm open to suggestions.