Dear Gunnar and friends,

thanks for the correction. I shall change it right away. I had
thought of pan'eva, but is still careless about the enclitics.


metta,
Yong Peng.

--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Gunnar Gällmo wrote:

> 11. Twice I wrote to him, but he did not send a reply even once.
> Aha.m tassa dvikkhattu.m likhi.m, pana eva so patilekhana.m
> ekakkhattu.m na pesesi.

Aren't "pana" and "eva" normally enclitic, and doesn't sandhi
normally turn "pana eva" into "pan'eva"?

So perhaps:

"so pan'eva patilekhana"m na pesesi."