Hi,

For 3, I have "Katama.m disa.m so agamii?" I was thinking the
direction he would go would be in acc., like going to a place. Why
would it be instrumental?

For 5, I have "Ko naama etassa phalassa?" Basically, I was
mirroring the form of 13-A-1 thru 3. I believe "naama" should be
nom. because of the use of "is" in the question; although it
disappears in the Pali, I would think it's an implied usage.
Can "Ko" and "Ki.m" be used interchangeably here?

Thanks.

Charles

--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, "Ong Yong Peng" <ypong001@...> wrote:
>
> An Elementary Pali Course
> Exercise 13-B: Translate into Pali.
>
> 3. In which direction did he go?
> katamena / disaaya / so / agami
> Katamena disaaya so agami?
>
> 5. What is the name of that fruit?
> ki.m / (hoti) / naama.m / etassa / phalassa
> Ki.m etassa phalassa naama.m?
>
>
> metta,
> Yong Peng.