From: Piya Tan
Message: 6102
Date: 2005-01-09
> Hmmm. Does that mean that dropping diacritical marks was a bad idea
> from the start? It was done as a result of a technical constraint.
> Then path dependency kicks in and we are almost stuck with these "bad
> spellings". Perhaps we should emphasise this aspect more and start a
> campaign to rid Dhamma publications of non-diacritical (sloppy) paali
> terms.
>
> Dennis
>
> --- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Gunnar G�llmo <gunnargallmo@...> wrote:
> >� --- libris <libris@...> skrev:
> > >
> > > Dear Dennis & friends,
> > >
> > > Reading Pali is like reading a musical score:
> > > actually Pali is musical in its own way. Each
> > > diacriticised character is a letter in itself. If
> > > the diacritics are removed, the result is clearly
> > > bad spelling! This is like removing all the vowels
> > > from the English alphabet.
> > >
> > Or like removing all the accents from French.
> >
> > Gunnar
> >
> > =====
> > gunnargallmo@...
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> [Homepage] http://www.tipitaka.net
> [Send Message] pali@yahoogroups.com
> Paaliga.na - a community for Pali students
> Yahoo! Groups members can set their delivery options to daily digest or web only.
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> �