--- Dear Dimitry,
Could we clarify this. Am I right in reading that you now accept that
the sukkhavipassaka is without mundane jhana?
Pali@yahoogroups.com, "Dimitry A. Ivakhnenko (äÍÉÔÒÉÊ áÌÅËÓÅÅ×ÉÞ
é×ÁÈÎÅÎËÏ)" <koleso@...> wrote:

>
> > OTK> Please learn pali correctly-this com mentioned 5 arahant
> OTK> ,it means 4 arahant with each one type of jhana plus the fifth
> OTK> one without jhana.
>
> Kitagiri sutta commentary says:
>
> Pa~n~naavimuttoti pa~n~naaya vimutto. So sukkhavipassako, catuuhi
> jhaanehi vu.t.thaaya arahatta.m pattaa cattaaro caati imesa.m vasena
> pa~ncavidhova hoti. Paa.li panettha

a.t.thavimokkhapa.tikkhepavaseneva

> aagataa. Yathaaha- "na heva kho a.t.tha vimokkhe kaayena phusitvaa
> viharati, pa~n~naaya cassa disvaa aasavaa parikkhii.naa honti. Aya.m
> vuccati puggalo pa~n~naavimutto"ti.
>
> Dimitry: Thank you for correction, it seems you are right.
>

RobertK