thanks for the explanation, Tim. I am no expert in history. I shall
humbly withdraw the term 'ruthless', although, in my opinion, all
invaders (not 'liberators') are still ruthless, regardless of the
grounds of the invasion.
As for the use of Turks over muslims, I have regarded, as I have
learnt from some books, that the invasion of N. India is part of the
entire series of Islamic conquest starting with prophet Muhammad in
Mecca and Medina. However, the positive distinction you have
provided on the fact that not all muslims are war-driven is an
important point for our multi-religious society. I do not dispute
over this.
I am glad to have learnt a good history lesson from everyone. Thanks.