Dear Dimitry and friends,

thanks a lot, I had misunderstood Warder's. Now, it should be:

Related words
1. tv eva = tu + eva: however (PED tu);
2. t'eva = ti + eva: "indeed", definitely;
3. kin ti - how, how then (PED kin).

[note: if you have problem searching "iti" on PED site, search
for "itara" instead, and click on "itara 2". Although I have
encountered similar problem with other words before, it only occurs
to me now what has gone wrong. I guess this is because the word
entry for "iti" runs over from page 118 to page 119, and so the
indexing software include it under 'itara 2".]

metta,
Yong Peng

--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Dimitry A. Ivakhnenko wrote:
> OYPyyc> Related word:
> OYPyyc> 1. tv eva (or t'eva) - ti + eva = end quote +
> OYPyyc> emphasis: "indeed", "definitely"
>
> Isn't tveva = tu + eva (See PED article on 'tu')?