Hi,
I'm not sure if this helps, but I just came across another
"m" in a compound. At M I 302, "adukkha-m-asukhaa",
apparently "m" can be a junction consonant, although "d"
seems more normal, such as: a~n~na+atthu = a~n~nadatthu.
I haven't read the particular passage.
Good Luck!
Paul O Cuana

--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, "äÍÉÔÒÉÊ áÌÅËÓÅÅ×ÉÞ é×ÁÈÎÅÎËÏ (Dimitry
A. Ivakhnenko)" <koleso@...> wrote:

> Dear Yong Peng,
>
> OYPyyc> If we use a~n~naatu.m, how do we account for the letter 'm'

in the

> OYPyyc> compound subhaasita-dubbhaasitaanam-attha-ma~n~naatu.m?

Kindly

> OYPyyc> enlighten me. Thank you.
>
> It belongs to 'attha.m'.
>
> Metta, Dimitry