At 12:00 AM 16-07-02, tzungkuen wrote:

>Dear Ven. Kumaara:
>
>Thanks for your reply
>I also used CSCD version. I think my 'pat.ijaananti'is equal to your "pa.tijaananti"
>the t in the prefix "pati-" is a cerebral.

If you look at your earlier mail, you actually left out the "i"s: "pat.jaanaathaa", "pat.jaananti", 'pat.jaananti'. I assume that it wasn't a typing error in your part since it's the same in all three instances. I thought that's the cause of confusion.

> The problem is its inflection.
>Can it
>be analyzed into (pa.ti-j~naa)3.pl.p ? if it can, why (pa.ti-j~naa)3.s.p is pa.tijaanaati.

Why not?

peace

Ven Kumâra