DC> I think that for this seventh "simile" -- actually, I think "comparison"
DC> would be a better word here -- we need only look at the first sentence,
DC> since the pattern after that is the same as all the others.
Well, I like to read suttas in full. The repetitions make sense. It is
not the abstract sense which counts but what is going on in your mind when
you read the sutta.
Let me tell you, monks, let me answer you, monks, that it better for a
person, immoral, wicked, unclean and suspect in conduct, secretive in
deeds, not a contemplative though claiming to be one, not leading the
holy life though claiming to do so, inwardly rotten, oozing with
desire, filthy by nature, if a strong man, having gripped one heels up
head down, were to put one down into a red-hot iron cauldron, burning,
blazing, glowing; and where there is boiling scum on top, he were to
go now up, now down, and now sideways.
Why so? For, monks, because of that he would suffer death, or
death-like agony, but on account of that, on the break-up of the body
after death, he won't be reborn in a place of woe, a realm of misery,
a state of punishment, a purgatory.
And monks, for such a person, immoral, wicked, unclean and suspect in
conduct, secretive in deeds, not a contemplative though claiming to be
one, not leading the holy life though claiming to do so, inwardly
rotten, oozing with desire, filthy by nature, who uses an abode
given in faith by wealthy kshatriya, brahmins, or householders, for
him, monks, there is a long-term harm and suffering, and on the
break-up of the body after death, he is reborn in a place of woe, a
realm of misery, a state of punishment, a purgatory.