During these last few weeks, you have
been witnessing some very active message movement in this forum. This
is as a result of my list of English words which I showed to be anagrams of
Turkish words and phrases. Along with the list, I explained that the
Indo-European and Semitic languages are manufactured languages from the much
older Turkish. The process used for this purpose was the simple technique
of "anagrammatizing". Even one of the recent writers noted
that Indo-European languages were invented languages and their
inventors were the religious people.
Evidently, some people who call
themselves "linguists" were very bothered from all this. Instead of
presenting scholarly talk with coherent essays, they chose to be linguistic
dogmatists claiming that only they, because they had gone to linguistic
schools and gotten a certificate, can talk about linguistics and put forward
ideas. According to them, no other person outside linguistics,
irregardless of their qualifications, can talk on the subject matter or raise
a voice against the established views. The sad part of all
these so-called discussions is that these "linguists" and their
supporters have chosen to attack me on a personel level by villifying me and
my ideas. These attackers (linguists) somehow have not even learned how to
discuss a new idea in a civilized manner, let alone express their views and
ask questions in a scholarly manner. Most of what I have seen from them is
noise designed to further confuse an already confused topic.
For
instance, I introduced the English word "ATONE" and "ATONEMENT" and said that
they were anagrams of Turkish "UTAN" and "UTANMA EDIN" respectively.
Along comes an "Abdullah" who mocks this, villifies me and then signs off his
email with "UTAN EDIN!" directed at me. This act itself is silly,
childish and immature. How am I expected to carry on a serious and
mature discussion on a rational level when I am confronted with this kind of
immaturity?
In this forum, I have presented many original papers with
revelations that are contrary to the established views. Up to several years
ago, I, too, was thinking along the same line as the established views.
However, after reading the so-called Pelasgian writing on the
Lemnos Island Stela and finding that it was Turkish, I began to question
more and more.
Up to that point, I was believing everything the
textbooks were saying about the ancient world but after finding that the
Pelasgians, i.e., the native people of ancient so-called Greece before the
Greeks got there, were speaking Turkish and were related to Etruscans
and Thracians, and Trojans, and Minoans and even, in fact, to the
Ionians (AY HANS of ancient Yunanistan), I began to suspect
everything. Particularly, when I found out that Homer was referring to TROY
as ILIUM, I realized that ILIUM was nothing but Turkish ILIM-U meaning "It
is my country".
After that, I read Homer's Iliad and Odysseus with a
magnifying glass and soon discovered that many of the character names were
anagrams of Turkish words and phrases representing personifications of
different concepts and deities. From that point on, all of my intense
research showed me that things were not the way that they have been
presented. The picture that was forming was that the ancient world was a
Turkic speaking Turanian world (i.e., Turkish). This was supported, not
only from the linguistic point of view, but also from the
archeological artifacts that were distributed all over the world.
One
of the distinct features of the ancient Turanians was their distinct conical
headdress which is still used by Turkish people in many parts of Central
Asia. Another distinct feature of the ancient Turanians was that their
tombstones had one top corner cut in a slanted fashion. In addition to
Central Asia and other parts of Asia, this kind of tombstone is found all
over Europe all the way to Ireland and Scotland and other places.
The
more I researched, the more I realized that there was a big deception going
on regarding the ancient world. Indeed the ancient world was a Turkic
speaking world contrary to all the disinformation that we have been subjected
to. When I mentioned my findings in this forum, those who call
themselves linguists went into denial mode and attacked me from all
sides.
I regard all those who are attacking me as not knowing the
ancient facts as I do. Some of the attackers may simply be defending
their own turf, but there may be others who actually know what has gone
on in the past regarding the trinity sky-god religion of the
ancient Turanians and how it was destroyed and usurped, and similarly how
the ancient Turanian language of Turkish was used to manufacture new
languages.
With my essays and discussions in this forum, I have been
completely open. I realize that my revelations are contrary to the
established views. I explained most everything in an easy-to-understand
fashion and presented 125 English words as a small sample of my
supporting evidence. This 125 word sample constitutes powerful evidence
of a deception having taken place. The deception is that English,
and other IE lnguages (and Semitic languages) have used Turkish words
and phrases to generate words in their languages but have not
been truthful about it. The new "Indo-European" words are created
by altering and anagrammatizing the Turkish words and phrases so
that their Turkishness is cleverly camouflaged. Dictionaries that
purport to giving word etymologies have collaborated in this deception
by pointing to mostly Greek ans Latin sources, yet the are themselves
are manufactured languages. Of course, in such matters no mention
of Turkish is ever made. The deception is actually much larger because
it involves hiding the fact that the ancient world was a Turkic
speaking Turanian world with a Turkic trinity Sky-God religion
(so-called "Paganism").
It should not be thought that I am
blurting big conclusions without having done my homework. I have read
and researched many topics ranging from ancient Masar (Egypt) to
religion. My research and analysis was thorough, my detective work
immaculate. My keen observation and vision allowed me to penetrate the
mountains of misinformation out there. With my detailed descriptions that I
shared with you all in this forum, I held a light to brighten the path
that leads to future understanding of linguistics. Unfortunately, some
who have been in the dark for so long have chosen to refuse my
light because its intensity disturbs their eyes. Hence, they rush
and desperately try to close every opening where light may be
entering their dark chamber in order to keep the darkness intact. Some
readers have understandably asked me for proof and I have replied that
the words themselves are the living proof. I cannot produce a two
or three thousand year old clearly written certificate admitting that such
an event was planned and executed. Nobody else can either. It is
understandable that those who took something not belonging to them, in the
past, would not leave behind such a document. However, in the process,
they left behind clues that, when put together, form a picture showing what
happened.
In the latest incoming e-mails, someone called "John" is
being extremely aggressive. John probably has not read my
previous writings. I cannot repeat them here again but they are all in
the archives of this forum. It would be beneficial for him, and
others who are interested, to read them. John most likely does not know
what deceptions have taken place in the past regarding the languages.
John accuses me with a concocted expression "FEM"
implying "falsehood". It is unfortunate for "John" to make such a
smear. It is not Polat Kaya that makes "falsehoods" but rather others
that have concocted "falsehoods" about the ancient world and have
perpetrated them up to now. Polat Kaya simply saw their hands in the
Turkish "cookie-jar".
John says "Sakas" are Iranians implying
that they are "Indo-European". He is wrong. If he had
investigated the "SAKA" identity, he would find that they are Turks -
contrary to his beliefs. The term "Iranian" does not indicate a particular
ethnicity. In that geography there have always been Tur/Turk peoples
present before the so-called Indo-European "Persians" were there. So what is
being portrayed today as "Iranian" or "Persian" is actually a mixture
of Turkish and later non-Turanians. When they talk about Iran,
they rarely mention the fact that almost half of the present population
are Turks. People have been conned so badly that it is difficult for
them to accept this fact now.
John says HYKSOS is the Greek word
that prevailed. Yes, ancient Greeks were one of the contributers to the
confusion. At every opportunity, they anagrammatized and changed the
ancient Turkic names and words. Greek words keep coming to the surface
because eurocentrics would like to see it that way. The Greek, Jewish
and Latin religious peoples were in ancient so-called Egypt by the
thousands. Not that they were there to help the religious needs of the
ancient Masarians (so-called "Egyptians"), but rather to learn about the
ancient Masarian civilization and religion so that later, it could be a)
used to destroy them from within and b) then usurped to generate
new "religions" and "cultures". That is why the most
long-lasting Tur/Turk state of human history has now become an
extinct civilization. Of course those religious cabalists also
changed everything Turkic wherever they found them. It must be
understood that those ancient so-called "Egyptians" did not refer to
themselves as "Egyptians" (meaning Gypsies) nor was their land called
"Egypt". These are the names given by the ancient Greeks to obliterate
the original names.
John would like to deny that "Troy" is an anagram
of Turkish "TUR ÖY" but even the Greek word "Troia" meaning "Troy" is an
anagram of Turkish "TUR-ÖYÜ" meaning "The house of TURS". For
John's information, the name TUR is the national name of TUR/TURK
peoples although he may try to deny that too.
When critics say that
Wallis Budge is outdated, they are trying to suppress the validity of his
works because this scholar was much more truthful than many. Wallis Budge's
works are not outdated.
In concluding, I want to reiterate that all that
I have said still stands irrespective of abrasive responses. So far, the
responses from those who oppose my views do not have any convincing power to
make me change my views.
Best wishes to all,
Polat
Kaya
July 31, 2003
"Biz
Cevirmenlere N'oluyor!" bilgi toplulugu, allingus Profesyonel Yabanci Dil
Cozumleri Ltd. Sti.'nin bir girisimidir.
allingus@... allingus2001@...
Toplulugumuza gonderilen iletilerdeki gorusler, bcn
yoneticilerini ve uyelerini baglayici degildir. Her uye bcn'ye gonderdigi veya
baska kisi ya da topluluklara yonlendirdigi iletilerden kendisinin sorumlu
oldugunu kabul eder. Bilgi toplulugumuzdan ayrilmak istediginizde ileti
gonderiniz: b_c_n_2003-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com